My parents purchased the home where I reside in Connestee
approximately twenty years ago. It is
one of the oldest homes in the development built in 1973. I was given the home
in 1999 because they were no longer able to travel from Florida.
Connestee offers numerous amenities and activities for
people desiring companionship and to enjoy an active lifestyle. I personally choose not to participate in
the activities nor do I dine in the clubhouse or golf. My assessment payments provide access
through the gate and use of security.
As a full time resident, I have witnessed many changes. Water prices are now six times the cost;
cable has tripled under Comporium, power costs are regularly increased since
becoming Duke Energy, and Connestee assessments and entry fees have more than
doubled. As a property owner, you were
part of a community that shared the burden of approving necessary
improvements by voting and paying your fair share. What was not expected were changes to the
philosophy of Connestee.
Several factors are involved in these changes. The subdivision is now forty years old. What was probably designed to be an upper
middle-income retirement community has changed significantly. Connestee wants a new image and the ability
to compete with other golf courses. This
will require substantial funds in the form of special assessments from property
owners to replace and or remodel the clubhouse and improve common areas. Will the list ever be finite? That is the concern.
Another problem is the disturbing fairness factor. We live in a community where the voters
determine the financial lives of all property owners. If you live on Social Security or a fixed
income this is particularly stressful especially if you are unable to meet your
obligation. A lien is placed on your
property and paid off at time of sale if you are fortunate enough in this
economy to secure a buyer.
The inflated entry fee of eight thousand dollars is in place
to discourage fixed/middle income residents to purchase within the
subdivision. It is also another obstacle
for homeowners who wish to leave Connestee.
Many sellers have had to absorb this fee at closing.
As an animal lover, it was very appealing that Connestee
protected wildlife. That is unless it is
determined that a particular animal is a “nuisance”. It was very upsetting to hear gunshots from
hunters killing Canadian geese in the subdivision. No explanation or conjured up justification
from management will erase my disgust and anger. Neighboring Sherwood Forest posts the protection
of the birds in their subdivision by membership in the Audubon Society.
In Summary:
Connestee Falls was a lovely place to live for over a
decade. Assessments escalated but
manageable. Most people in the
subdivision are warm and friendly.
Maintenance and security are the best.
But, the policy based on Connestee bylaws basically requiring that all
must now equally pay for the wants and desires of management and the affluent
are no longer sustainable. It has forced a proud community into screaming
matches at subdivision meetings each expressing their views. There is little trust that the presentation
facts are accurate and that the establishment will work in everyone’s best
interest.
The most embarrassing and shocking realization is the lack
of empathy or concern by management for the residents whereby these new
building projects may create financial hardships. It may be a recent political trend to force
your greed, wants and desires, and disregard the consequences it may have on
others. There is also no alternative but
to sell your home if you comprehend the manipulation and propaganda.
If you converse with management, they will state that you as
a property owner have a vote. What they
rarely contribute is the fact that any improvement under $350,000 doesn’t
require your vote. These funds should
suffice in obtaining bids and permits in anticipation of projects that are less
likely to be approved by owners. Once
the money has been approved for a particular phase of construction, there is
little chance of stopping construction of other phases and improvements. I have yet to receive an answer as to how
many times the association can enact the use of each $350,000 without a community vote.
As a recommendation to new prospective Connestee Falls
property owners, only sign the application after reading the entire Property
Owner’s Manual. The manual describing
the bylaws and rules and regulations is the size of a rural towns phone book
but worth the read. The bottom of the
application is where you agree to the terms and conditions and sign that you
are familiar with the provisions. I am
unaware of an actual legal document binding you to obey CFPOA rules and bylaws
other than the application.
If you enjoy a social atmosphere with numerous activities,
and you are fortunate enough to have substantial funds available to live in
Connestee without concern for the economic future, consider the advantages of
Connestee. If you question the fact that
voters control your fate, have empathy for owners forced to move, or you resent
anyone dictating what color you can paint your house, move on. I plan to do the latter.
Respectfully,
CFPOA, Property Owner